Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's League
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I'm going to delete this, then selectively undelete just the two edits by Lenticel to preserve the attribution history for the dab page. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Women's League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, only lasted 3 years, no assertion of notability made in the article. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, as pwer the above.Bandn (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Short-lived, non-notable organisation. It existed, that's about all you can say in its favour. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to Dab There's a lot of Women's League articles here in Wikipedia and this entry is a plausible redirect to them all. I've added a disambiguation entry below the article although the list could grow longer. --Lenticel (talk) 05:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.