Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atopia Projects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Atopia Projects

Atopia Projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organization, referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage in media shown at all. As always, something like this is not automatically entitled to an article just because it exists -- it needs to clear WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH on the strength of media coverage, but there's none being shown here at all and the article has existed for an entire decade without ever having any substance or sourcing added to it -- the wording remains substantively identical to the initial creation in 2007, with only minor formatting and maintenance edits ever having taken place since. Bearcat (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom, there is no evidence that this subject is supported by RSes. Dino monster (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like the organisation stopped updating their website 10 years ago. No refs that support gng. An advert. Szzuk (talk) 10:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete -- I agree with those above. I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.