Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americanization of INDIAN CHRISTIANITY
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (G11). The article was clearly written as a campaign piece, to promote a particular view. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Americanization of INDIAN CHRISTIANITY (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Short, unreferenced polemical piece about exactly what it says in the title. Fails WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:SOAPBOX andy (talk) 23:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If this where a concept that were referenced then I would be keener to keep but it's a soap box. JASpencer (talk) 23:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It clearly fails wikipedia guidelines.КĐ♥ 23:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Unfit for inclusion by any standards. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't fit Wikipedia article standards. Baseball Watcher 23:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dbrodbeck (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:SOAP - "A strong voice needs to be raised against this Western Christian hegemony," etc. StAnselm (talk) 02:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is original research, personal oppinion and unreferenced. It does sound like the type of topic that could be an article, but this doesn't seem suitable. Pi (Talk to me! ) 03:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.