TBrandley (talk · contribs · count) I'm TBrandley. I've gotten quite a few blocks, but I think I have learned, and I'd like to see how I am currently doing at Wikipedia, to improve, or become a better editor here. Thanks. TBrandley 23:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
- Honestly, I used to handled things horribly. I'd cause edit warring, and tons of other things, and have caused problems from other users :( I was blocked forever in March 2012. But was unblocked in April 2012. Since then, I think I am become a better editor. In the future I would continue to talk to the other user and try and work it out.
Reviews
- By TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs)
- You're a good editor, and I believe you've learned from your mistakes. One thing I would say is that you should always leave an edit summary (no matter how minuscule the edit), so users can track your work more easily. TRLIJC19 (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- By M.Mario (talk · contribs)
-
- Dont get me wrong, your a wonderful reviewer of GA articles, but when the June-July drive was on, you seemed to take to many articles under your belt, and ended up doing speedy passes, really short reviews, which resulted in quite a lot of "fail articles" when admin's went to check them at the drive. So next time when a drive comes aroud, try to limit the articles you review, giving them a full depth review, rather than a half hearted one. :) — M.Mario (T/C) 16:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- For example, Cora Cross has had a really short review, and theres still a lot more. In my opnion, I would ask for a second opinion on the article, so then the article could really be looked at. — M.Mario (T/C) 16:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Dont get me wrong, your a wonderful reviewer of GA articles, but when the June-July drive was on, you seemed to take to many articles under your belt, and ended up doing speedy passes, really short reviews, which resulted in quite a lot of "fail articles" when admin's went to check them at the drive. So next time when a drive comes aroud, try to limit the articles you review, giving them a full depth review, rather than a half hearted one. :) — M.Mario (T/C) 16:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)